Challenging “A Nation of Wimps!”
Friday, May 31st, 2013I was struck by my reaction to an article entitled, A Nation of Wimps, shared recently on Facebook. While this article was published originally in Psychology Today in November, 2004, it was “last reviewed” in February, 2013. The article highlights a seemingly then-current perception that “parental hyper-concern has the net effect of making kids more fragile,” and that “that may be why they’re breaking down in record numbers.” I certainly understand – and to some extent, agree – with the notion that “parental hyper-concern,” itself a manifestation of parental anxiety, can have a deleterious effect on a child’s developing sense of identity and autonomy. As a clinical psychologist, I have witnessed many times the degree to which anxious parents struggle with letting their children take even minor risks in their efforts to explore, and eventually, separate from home to live independent lives. Further, anxious parents often foster over-attached children who find it difficult, if not painful, to stray too far from the parental nest. I understand this dynamic and have dealt with it frequently in my pediatric psychology practice. While this dynamic can, indeed, be challenging for parents and children alike, labeling children of anxious parents as “wimps” seems a bit condescending, if not utterly disrespectful.
The author, Ms. Hara Estroff Marano, highlights the fact that many parents seek educational assessments for their children in an effort to explore the possibility that they might qualify for various accommodations – such as extended time or taking tests in a distraction-free setting – claiming that these accommodations “sanitize childhood” and therefore, deprive children and adolescents of the psychological equivalent of “skinned knees or the occasional C in history.” To strengthen her case, Ms. Estroff-Marano even cites child psychologist David Elkind of Tufts University as having stated, “We learn through experience and we learn through bad experiences. Through failure we learn how to cope.” I do not doubt that Professor Elkind uttered these words, and to some extent, I agree with him. We do learn from “bad experiences,” but if these “bad experiences” are frequent, intense and/or enduring, the “learning” can take on a more negative and damaging quality. (more…)